Click HERE to read Gigi Francisco's comments on the synthesis report on ICAE's Virtual Seminar, entitled, "Education in a World Crisis: Limits and Possibilities Facing Rio+20 by Jorge

See Photos at DAWN's FACEBOOK page

For more resources on Rio+20 and Cairo+20, click HERE

Visit this PAGE for more resources on DAWN's analyses

Back to HOME

Building capacity for human rights organizations to carry out advocacy on financial regulation matters will not happen overnight, but this is not a reason not to begin the process today. Ultimately, doing so is not only in the interest of the human rights community, but represents the only path to reforms of the financial sector that guarantee more sustainable, more resilient, more just and more democratic financial and economic systems.

Click DOWNLOAD for the full version

Visit this PAGE for more resources on DAWN's analyses

Back to HOME

As we move toward the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20 in June 2012[1], and in view of the Nadi Conference on Seabed Mining co-organised by the government of Fiji and the International Seabed Authority[2], we the undersigned civil society groups write to express our deep concern over steps taken to legitimize and fast-track experimental seabed mining as a development option in the Pacific region.

Both Tonga and Nauru are pursuing exploration licenses in international waters in the east Pacific through their sponsorship of companies Tonga Offshore Mining Limited (Tonga) and Nauru Offshore Resources Inc. (Nauru).  Korean Ocean Research and Development Institute (KORDI) also believes it will soon receive a licence in Fiji for deep sea mining. The Canadian mining company Nautilus Minerals Inc is expected, as early as the end of 2012, to begin mining the Seafloor Massive Sulphide system at depths of 1.46 kilometres under the sea off the coast of New Ireland in Papua New Guinea. These companies will be extracting high-value minerals, such as, gold, silver, copper, ore, and manganese, shifting their effort to the seas and away from land where their centuries of extraction have led to disappearing mineral deposits.

Experimental seabed mining is a recent trend in ocean exploitation. There is much hype about its advantages especially for poor countries while we hear much less about its risks on the conservation of our common natural heritage and safeguarding of our people’s welfare. There are still significant unanswered questions about the socio-cultural and environmental impacts of seabed mining and of its underlying science. We also don’t know exactly how it will affect other sustainable use of ocean resources.

The world’s first experimental seabed mine in PNG will radically affect the flow of thousands of underwater vents over an 11 hectare area. These high-temperature vents host unique microbes and animals, most of which have not yet been identified or studied. We are not even sure of their specific roles in local and global ecosystems, but some scientists have stated that possibly the origins of life on earth can be found in these vents. The result of this experimental mining is destruction of these vents and the vibrant and unique ecosystems that they support.[3]

Communities that will potentially be affected are in rural and remote areas of the Pacific, with fragile and biodiversity-important ecosystems. The underwater mine sites and support infrastructures for such purposes as, transportation, stockpiling, trans-shipment and processing of minerals, will be located close to coastal communities that rely heavily on the sea for their diet and income.

The project is already raising alarm among these directly affected communities. In PNG, citizens are questioning the political process that led to the licensing of the New Ireland project and other mining developments where there is little concern shown by successive governments to address core human rights and sustainable development concerns. In Fiji concerns are being raised on the usefulness of extractive industries as an overall development strategy, with calls from civil society for ecologically-sound alternatives.

Legitimising experimental mining

We are angry that SOPAC, with the financial support of the European Union, is assisting Pacific states to push forward the development of a regional legislative and regulatory framework for experimental seabed mining.[4] Under this rubric of socio-economic development, experimental seabed mining becomes established as a lawful activity, without the benefit of adequate scientific debates nor of prior public dialogue and meaningful community participation. The EU-funded project includes the Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor Leste, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.

Why develop a legislative regime for something that has not even proved itself? Why the rush?

Industry and governments appear to have abandoned the application of a precautionary approach and any pretence of balancing profits with conservation, human rights compliance, and sustainable development. Experimental seabed mining must surely be a prime situation to apply the precautionary approach as an integral part of due diligence obligations, including:

 “in situations where scientific evidence concerning the scope and potential negative impact of the activity in question is insufficient but where there are plausible indications of potential risks”.[5] 

We call on Pacific governments, technical agencies and donors to immediately stop legitimizing seabed mining and instead apply the precautionary approach to the issue of extractive industries and other similar corporate activities in the region. We remind technical agencies and donors such as SOPAC and the EU to recognise that their overall responsibility is to ensure the common heritage and sustainable development for all, especially the people of the region. The people of the Pacific require much more scientific evidence before our environment and its peoples can again be used as a testing ground for the rest of the world.

We stood together as a region when nuclear proliferation was being pushed by external parties, and we will do so again against new forms of human rights violations and unsustainable development, such as the kind being pushed based on danger-filled extractive industries.

Signed by the following organisations and individuals:

Effrey Dademo

Director

Act Now!

PNG

Rosa Koian

ICE Coordinator

Bismarck Ramu Group, PNG

Maureen Penjueli

Coordinator

Pacific Network on Globalisation

Fiji

Gigi Francisco

Global Coordinator

Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN)

International

Noelene Nabulivou

Management Collective Member

Women’s Action for Change, WAC

Fiji

Visit this PAGE for more resources on DAWN's analyses


Back to HOME

On the occasion of the World AIDS Day 1 December 2011, WABA is pleased to issue the following Statement "Getting to Zero: Zero New HIV Infections, Zero Discrimination, Zero AIDS-Related Deaths -- Making GETTING TO ZERO a Reality for HIV-Infected Mothers and Their Children". 

http://waba.org.my/pdf/wad2011-statement.pdf

The Statement brings critical updated information on this complex issue of HIV and infant feeding policy guidelines and decision making; and the important role of exclusive breastfeeding in HIV intervention and child survival!

We also urge you to take note of a recently update paper by WABA with references  on "What Women need to know on HIV and Infant Feeding". 

http://waba.org.my/pdf/wad2011-wwntk.pdf

This short document aims to guide all women in understanding this complex issue better, and help them make informed decisions on needed treatment and infant feeding for both maternal health and prevention HIV transmission to infants. All health and women's health activists will find this document most useful!


Visit this PAGE for more resources on DAWN's analyses


Back to HOME